Building for Vegas: Inside the A's Farm System
While everything else was chaos, the A's player development operation has been quietly building something. Who is coming for the Las Vegas era?
One of the genuinely complicated things about being an A's fan during the relocation saga is that the team has been doing something right in a domain that is easy to miss while paying attention to everything that is going wrong. The Athletics' player development and farm system have been, for the past several years, among the better operations in baseball. The disconnect between the franchise's organizational dysfunction and its developmental competence is real, and understanding both is necessary for an honest picture of what the Las Vegas team might eventually look like.
The System's Foundation
Baseball America, FanGraphs, and MLB Pipeline all rank the A's farm system in the upper half of MLB organizations as of early 2026. For a franchise that is playing in a Triple-A stadium while its permanent home is under construction, that ranking represents genuine organizational capacity.
The strengths are concentrated in specific areas. The A's have historically been good at identifying pitching talent in the draft, particularly in the mid and later rounds where value is hardest to find. They have maintained strong instructional and developmental programs at the minor-league levels, and player development personnel have remained relatively stable even as major-league coaching staffs have turned over.
The other organizational strength is in analytics integration. The A's may have less money to spend on free agents than most teams, but their analytical approach to development -- using biomechanical data, pitch design work, and opponent-specific preparation at the minor-league level -- has been among the more sophisticated in baseball. Several A's prospects who have reached the majors have shown velocity and command improvements that track directly to developmental interventions.
The Names to Watch
Without drilling into specific scouting reports, which change rapidly and are better consulted closer to actual playing time, a few organizational threads are worth understanding.
The A's 2024 draft class was widely regarded as one of their strongest in recent memory, centered around several college pitchers with advanced command profiles and a couple of position players with plus raw tools. The 2023 class, particularly the higher-round selections, should be reaching Double-A and Triple-A in 2026 and beginning to put pressure on the major-league roster.
The Sacramento roster in 2025 and 2026 has served a dual function: it is both the major-league team playing an abnormal schedule and the primary pipeline for prospects who need full-season at-bats or innings at the highest minor-league level. The proximity of the major-league environment to the development environment has created some interesting dynamics, including cases where young players who might have spent a full season at Triple-A under normal circumstances have instead gotten spot major-league appearances.
The 2028 Vision
The A's front office has framed the Las Vegas stadium opening in 2028 as the target date for a competitive team. The math on this is workable in theory: if the highest-rated prospects in the current system are eighteen to twenty-one years old in 2026, they are twenty to twenty-three in 2028, which is when a player's development trajectory, if things go well, begins to produce major-league production.
This is baseball development logic at its most optimistic, and baseball development is famously unpredictable. Prospects fail. Injuries intervene. The player who looks like a franchise cornerstone at Double-A sometimes cannot hit a major-league breaking ball. The track record of "building through the farm system" plans is mixed at best, and the history of the Athletics specifically includes multiple cycles of promising young core development followed by premature trading of the components.
The concern that applies specifically to the A's under Fisher is whether the ownership commitment to retaining developed talent will be different in Las Vegas than it was in Oakland. The pattern in Oakland was clear: the A's would develop a young player, bring him to the major leagues, and trade him when his arbitration salary became expensive -- before reaching free agency, before earning the contract that would represent the payoff on the franchise's developmental investment.
If the Las Vegas era reproduces this pattern, the farm system's quality becomes almost irrelevant: the talent will be developed and then moved before it can be deployed for the purposes the franchise claims to be pursuing.
The Counterargument
The honest counterargument to this pessimism is that the Las Vegas market creates different economic incentives. A franchise that needs to build a local fan base from scratch, in a market that is skeptical of baseball's ability to take hold, has reasons to keep popular young players that the Oakland franchise did not have. The need to win, to generate excitement, to justify the move -- these are real pressures on the ownership to behave differently than it did in Oakland.
Several franchise-building examples in major professional sports involve ownership that changed behavior in new markets. The Las Vegas Raiders have invested in their roster in ways that the Oakland Raiders sometimes did not. The Golden Knights spent aggressively to win early and built a foundation for sustainable fan engagement. These are not certain templates for the A's, but they represent the range of possible outcomes.
What Sacramento Is Showing
The Sacramento years have been, among other things, a talent development opportunity. Young players on the major-league roster are getting genuine experience under big-league conditions. The Sacramento environment, for all its limitations, has produced significant plate appearances and innings pitched for players who are in the developmental timeline the organization cares about.
Whether those players look different when the team reaches Las Vegas, and whether the franchise will be willing to spend to complement them and retain them, is the central question for the Athletic's competitive future. The farm system provides the foundation. What gets built on top of it depends on decisions that have not yet been made and on an ownership philosophy that, in Oakland, consistently chose the smaller investment.
The talent is there or arriving. The question is what the franchise does with it. Oakland fans, watching from a distance, have seen this movie before.
Support LV Athletics Nation by shopping through our affiliate links. Every purchase helps fund independent coverage of the A's relocation story.
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.